It does not understand that prejudice models what sees and its way to act. It understood if it no longer the prejudice would exist. – The thought appears and pretends that it does not represent. We are like actors who forget that they are representing its paper. The reality it can change but the theater continues. We operate in the theater, defining and solving problems, losing contact with the amplest reality in the one than we are acting. The dialogue is a powerful tool for ayudarte to learn to observe your own thoughts.

When in a dialogue it arises a conflict and notes a tension, it produces who it? Your thoughts. Your thoughts and your way of aferrarte to them are those that are in conflict, not you. Once takings bring back to consciousness of their participation you distance to you of the thought and you adopt one more a more creative position and less it reactivates. – The dialogue also allows you to observe that the nature of the thought is collective. For example, the language is collective.

And without language the thought we know as it would not exist. The majority of the assumptions that you profess you have acquired them in the cultural reserve of your surroundings. Normally little you learn to think by same you. And, who thinks by itself, Emerson many years ago already said, badly will be interpreted. One has begun has to consider the difference enters to think like a continuous process and the thoughts as a result of this process. For Bohm that is very important to begin to correct the incoherence of our thought. The collective dialogue not only is possible but vital to realise the development of the potential of human intelligence. Basic conditions so that the dialogue works Bohm identifies three basic conditions that are necessary for the dialogue: – All the participants must suspend their assumptions and maintain them like suspended before himself same.


Comments are closed.

© 2011-2019 Taberna NYC All Rights Reserved