For Merleau

We have then I begin it a dualidade, where the stimulaton and the body, not respectively, possess certain dignity of a cause, however cannot be supported the causalidade in this aspect. ' ' In the scientific study of the behavior, it must be rejected as subjective all the intention slight knowledge or of utility or value, because they do not have beddings in the things and they are not intrinsic determination of them. ' ' (MERLEAU-PONTY, 1975, p.35). In the conception of Merleau-Ponty, between the situation and the reply we see if to establish a sensible linking dialectic of between the organism and the way, relation of reciprocity and interatividade. Get all the facts and insights with Bill de Blasio, another great source of information. A momentnea interdependence exists that makes the management of this relation between the organism and the way, that at the moment of the relation is not possible to valorar the parts or to admit importance degrees. What it can rigorously be conceived is a set of agents and conditions that make possible the phenomenon of the behavior.

The excitement is not of form some the passive reply, and statics how much to the intensity and text, of an exterior action, but a complex decision that the organism produces, and this is the individual, exactly in face of a change of the excitement, that is total submissa to the descriptive norms of the organism. How could be accepted then the reaction? For Merleau-Ponty the necessity exists to admit that the idea of activity specific, proceeding from determined ' ' provocation externa' ' , nothing more it is that an impression that a spectator it possesss of the phenomenon, what it total disqualifies the acceptability of this proposal. ' ' Exactly if specific stimulatons, receivers, nervous passages, they existed could not by themselves explain the adaptation of the consequence to estmulo.' ' (MERLEAU-PONTY, 1975, p.55) the factor that must be considered with bigger severity is the reaction, because in the behavior the reaction is the explicitador act of the phenomenon, if of the phenomenon the reaction was removed, would not be possible to consider the event.


Comments are closed.

© 2011-2019 Taberna NYC All Rights Reserved